@prefix p66: . @prefix skos: . @prefix isothes: . @prefix uneskos: . @prefix dc: . @prefix xsd: . @prefix inist: . @prefix rdf: . p66:-Homme skos:prefLabel "Human"@en, "Homme"@fr ; a isothes:ConceptGroup ; skos:member p66:-LPNVDGSN-6 . p66:-LPNVDGSN-6 skos:broader p66:-CMSW56PP-5 ; uneskos:memberOf p66:-Homme, p66:-MemoryAndLawGroup, p66:-Psychologie ; dc:bibliographicCitation """ • Logue, M., Book, A. S., Frosina, P., Huizinga, T., & Amos, S. (2015). Using reality monitoring to improve deception detection in the context of the cognitive interview for suspects. Law and Human Behavior, 39(4), 360–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000127

• Type de document : étude empirique

• Accès : fermé

"""@fr, """ • Frosina, P., Logue, M., Book, A., Huizinga, T., Amos, S., & Stark, S. (2018). The effect of cognitive load on nonverbal behavior in the cognitive interview for suspects. Personality and Individual Differences, 130, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.012

• Type de document : étude empirique

• Accès : fermé

"""@fr, """ • Noc, M., Ginet, M., & Deslauriers-Varin, N. (2022). False confession in innocent suspects: A look at the cognitive interview for suspects. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-022-09543-5

• Document type: empirical study

• Access: closed

"""@en, """ • Logue, M., Book, A. S., Frosina, P., Huizinga, T., & Amos, S. (2015). Using reality monitoring to improve deception detection in the context of the cognitive interview for suspects. Law and Human Behavior, 39(4), 360–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000127

• Document type: empirical study

• Access: closed

"""@en, """ • Noc, M., Ginet, M., & Deslauriers-Varin, N. (2022). The cognitive interview for suspects: A test with customs officers. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1587

• Document type: empirical study

• Access: closed

"""@en, """ • Noc, M., Ginet, M., & Deslauriers-Varin, N. (2022). False confession in innocent suspects: A look at the cognitive interview for suspects. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-022-09543-5

• Type de document : étude empirique

• Accès : fermé

"""@fr, """ • Noc, M., Ginet, M., & Deslauriers-Varin, N. (2022). The cognitive interview for suspects: A test with customs officers. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1587

• Type de document : étude empirique

• Accès : fermé

"""@fr, """ • Geiselman, R. E. (2012). The cognitive interview for suspects (CIS). American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 30, 5–20.

• Type de document : étude empirique

• Accès : fermé

"""@fr, """ • Frosina, P., Logue, M., Book, A., Huizinga, T., Amos, S., & Stark, S. (2018). The effect of cognitive load on nonverbal behavior in the cognitive interview for suspects. Personality and Individual Differences, 130, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.012

• Document type: empirical study

• Access: closed

"""@en, """ • Geiselman, R. E. (2012). The cognitive interview for suspects (CIS). American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 30, 5–20.

• Document type: empirical study

• Access: closed

"""@en ; skos:definition "Adaptation de l’Entretien cognitif pour l’interrogatoire de suspects. Certaines consignes ont pour objectif d’augmenter la charge cognitive afin de faciliter la détection du mensonge. L’entretien comporte huit étapes (d’après Logue et al., 2015, p. 362) : (a) établissement d’un rapport de confiance avec le suspect ; (b) rappel initial de l’événement ; (c) restauration mentale du contexte de l’événement en le restituant dans l’ordre séquentiel ; (d) rappel supplémentaire ; (e) questions ouvertes ; (f) rappel de l’événement dans l’ordre inverse ; (g) contestation de l’histoire par l’enquêteur comme étant fausse ; (h) récit final de l’événement."@fr, "Adaptation of the Cognitive Interview for the interrogation of suspects. Some of the instructions are designed to increase the cognitive load in order to facilitate deception detection. The method has eight stages: \"(a) rapport building, (b) initial recall of event, (c) reinstate the context of the event by drawing the event in sequential order, (d) additional recall, (e) follow-up questions (open ended), (f) recall of event in reverse order, (g) interviewer challenges the story as false, and (h) final recounting of event. In the last stage, the suspect is allowed to clarify or change any information they wish, before the final closure stage of the process.\" (Logue et al., 2015, p. 362)."@en ; dc:modified "2023-08-21"^^xsd:date ; inist:domain "Psychology"@en, "Psychologie"@fr ; skos:prefLabel "Entretien cognitif pour suspects"@fr, "Cognitive Interview for Suspects"@en ; skos:related p66:-F5X8HXL1-6, p66:-Z3ZVMZ87-7 ; inist:semCategory "Homme"@fr, "Human"@en ; skos:altLabel "CIS"@en ; dc:creator "Frank Arnould"^^rdf:PlainLiteral ; a skos:Concept ; inist:isStudyMethodOf p66:-D720VZZ8-3 ; dc:created "2022-09-09"^^xsd:date ; skos:inScheme p66: . p66:-F5X8HXL1-6 skos:prefLabel "cognitive load"@en, "charge cognitive"@fr ; a skos:Concept ; skos:related p66:-LPNVDGSN-6 . p66:-CMSW56PP-5 skos:prefLabel "cognitive interview"@en, "entretien cognitif"@fr ; a skos:Concept ; skos:narrower p66:-LPNVDGSN-6 . p66:-D720VZZ8-3 skos:prefLabel "autobiographical memory"@en, "mémoire autobiographique"@fr ; a skos:Concept ; inist:hasStudyMethod p66:-LPNVDGSN-6 . p66:-MemoryAndLawGroup skos:prefLabel "Regroupement thématique Mémoire et justice"@fr, "Thematic grouping Memory and Law"@en ; a isothes:ConceptGroup ; skos:member p66:-LPNVDGSN-6 . p66:-Z3ZVMZ87-7 skos:prefLabel "mental context reinstatement"@en, "restauration mentale du contexte"@fr ; a skos:Concept ; skos:related p66:-LPNVDGSN-6 . p66:-Psychologie skos:prefLabel "Psychologie"@fr, "Psychology"@en ; a isothes:ConceptGroup ; skos:member p66:-LPNVDGSN-6 . p66: a skos:ConceptScheme .