@prefix p66: . @prefix skos: . @prefix isothes: . @prefix inist: . @prefix dc: . @prefix uneskos: . @prefix n9j: . @prefix xsd: . p66:-H0017Q3P-H skos:prefLabel "demonstration for more detail technique"@en, "technique de démonstration du rappel détaillé"@fr ; a skos:Concept ; skos:related p66:-CMSW56PP-5 . p66:-Psychologie skos:prefLabel "Psychologie"@fr, "Psychology"@en ; a isothes:ConceptGroup ; skos:member p66:-CMSW56PP-5 . p66:-D720VZZ8-3 skos:prefLabel "autobiographical memory"@en, "mémoire autobiographique"@fr ; a skos:Concept ; inist:hasStudyMethod p66:-CMSW56PP-5 . p66:-LPNVDGSN-6 skos:prefLabel "Entretien cognitif pour suspects"@fr, "Cognitive Interview for Suspects"@en ; a skos:Concept ; skos:broader p66:-CMSW56PP-5 . p66:-GWXM150S-5 skos:prefLabel "investigative interview"@en, "entretien d’enquête"@fr ; a skos:Concept ; skos:narrower p66:-CMSW56PP-5 . p66:-TKZB8HG9-6 skos:prefLabel "principe de la spécificité de l'encodage"@fr, "encoding specificity principle"@en ; a skos:Concept ; skos:related p66:-CMSW56PP-5 . p66:-DP4NMT2L-9 skos:prefLabel "episodic memory"@en, "mémoire épisodique"@fr ; a skos:Concept ; inist:hasStudyMethod p66:-CMSW56PP-5 . p66:-XVDS7MK9-D skos:prefLabel "Holistic Cognitive Interview"@en, "Entretien cognitif holistique"@fr ; a skos:Concept ; skos:broader p66:-CMSW56PP-5 . p66:-Homme skos:prefLabel "Human"@en, "Homme"@fr ; a isothes:ConceptGroup ; skos:member p66:-CMSW56PP-5 . p66: a skos:ConceptScheme . p66:-LGSX4MDR-2 skos:prefLabel "Entretien cognitif adapté à la description des personnes"@fr, "Cognitive Interview for Person Description"@en ; a skos:Concept ; skos:broader p66:-CMSW56PP-5 . p66:-MemoryAndLawGroup skos:prefLabel "Regroupement thématique Mémoire et justice"@fr, "Thematic grouping Memory and Law"@en ; a isothes:ConceptGroup ; skos:member p66:-CMSW56PP-5 . p66:-Z3ZVMZ87-7 skos:prefLabel "mental context reinstatement"@en, "restauration mentale du contexte"@fr ; a skos:Concept ; skos:related p66:-CMSW56PP-5 . p66:-CMSW56PP-5 dc:creator "Frank Arnould" ; skos:scopeNote "La première version de l’Entretien Cognitif, publiée au milieu des années 1980, propose à la personne interrogée d’utiliser quatre aides mnésiques pour améliorer son rappel libre du crime : 1) le rappel exhaustif des faits, même de ceux qui peuvent lui paraître sans importance ; 2) la restauration mentale du contexte physique et émotionnel du crime ; 3) le changement d’ordre des faits, consistant pour la personne à tenter de se souvenir des faits en commençant par la fin de l’évènement et à remonter ensuite dans le temps ; 4) le changement de perspective, la personne devant se souvenir des faits en utilisant une perspective différente de la sienne, par exemple, en prenant celle d’un autre témoin présent sur les lieux. Ces aides ont été choisies à partir d’arguments scientifiques sur le fonctionnement de la mémoire (principe de l’encodage spécifique de [Tulving et Thomson, 1973] et accès multiple aux traces mnésiques [Bower, 1967]). Dans les années 1990, une nouvelle version de l’Entretien cognitif ajoute des techniques de communication sociale. Plusieurs équipes de recherche testent également des versions modifiées de la technique afin de l’adapter à des populations particulières (les enfants, par exemple), pour en construire des versions plus courtes en supprimant les aides les moins intéressantes (changement d’ordre et changement de perspective), ou encore en intégrant de nouvelles consignes de rappel ou en modifiant certaines consignes habituelles (par exemple, le remplacement de la restauration mentale du contexte par le dessin de la scène de crime)."@fr, "The first version of the Cognitive Interview, published in the mid-1980s, asked the person being interviewed to use four memory aids to improve their free recall of the crime: 1) exhaustive recall of the facts, even those that may seem unimportant; 2) mental reinstatement of the physical and emotional context of the crime; 3) change of order of the facts, consisting of the person trying to remember the facts starting with the end of the event and then going back in time; 4) change of perspective, with the person having to remember the facts using a perspective different from his or her own, for example, by taking that of another witness present at the scene. These aids were chosen on the basis of scientific arguments about the functioning of memory (Tulving and Thomson's principle of specific encoding [1973] and Bower's multiple access to memory traces [1967]). The first version of the Cognitive Interview, published in the mid-1980s, asked the person being interviewed to use four memory aids to improve their free recall of the crime: 1) exhaustive recall of the facts, even those that may seem unimportant; 2) mental reinstatement of the physical and emotional context of the crime; 3) change of order of the facts, consisting of the person trying to remember the facts starting with the end of the event and then going back in time; 4) change of perspective, with the person having to remember the facts using a perspective different from his or her own, for example, by taking that of another witness present at the scene. These aids were chosen on the basis of scientific arguments about the functioning of memory (Tulving and Thomson's principle of specific encoding [1973] and Bower's multiple access to memory traces [1967]). In the 1990s, a new version of the Cognitive Interview added social communication techniques. Several research teams are also testing modified versions of the protocol in order to adapt it to particular populations (e.g. children), to construct shorter versions by removing the least interesting aids (change of order and change of perspective), or by integrating new recall instructions or modifying some of the usual instructions (e.g. replacing the mental reinstatement of context by the drawing of the crime scene).."@en ; inist:isStudyMethodOf p66:-D304PDBZ-3, p66:-D720VZZ8-3, p66:-DP4NMT2L-9 ; skos:hiddenLabel "cognitive interviews"@en, "entretiens cognitifs"@fr ; dc:bibliographicCitation """ • Verkampt, F., Ginet, M., & Colomb, C. (2014). The influence of social instructions on the effectiveness of a cognitive interview used with very young child witnesses. European Review of Applied Psychology, 64(6), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2014.09.003

• Type de document : étude empirique

• Accès : fermé

"""@fr, """ • van Can, S., Dodier, O., Otgaar, H., & Verkampt, F. (2016). The benefits of multiple recollection strategies on adolescents’ testimonies: Quality versus within-statement consistency? Journal of Forensic Practice, 18(2), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-01-2015-0007

• Type de document : étude empirique

• Accès : fermé

"""@fr, """ • Py, J., & Demarchi, S. (2006). L’entretien cognitif : Son efficacité, son application et ses spécificités. Revue Québecoise de Psychologie, 27(3), 177‑196.

• Document type: literature review

• Access: closed

"""@en, """ • Ashkenazi, T., & Fisher, R. P. (2022). Field test of the cognitive interview to enhance eyewitness and victim memory, in intelligence investigations of terrorist attacks. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 11(2), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101871

• Document type: empirical study

• Access: closed

"""@en, """ • Brunel, M., & Py, J. (2013). Questioning the acceptability of the Cognitive Interview to improve its use. L’Année Psychologique, 113(3), 427‑458. https://doi.org/10.4074/S0003503313003059

• Type de document : revue de la littérature

• Accès : ouvert

"""@fr, """ • Paulo, R. M., Albuquerque, P. B., & Bull, R. (2016). The enhanced cognitive interview: Expressions of uncertainty, motivation and its relation with report accuracy. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(4), 366–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1109089

• Type de document : étude empirique

• Accès : fermé

"""@fr, """ • Ginet, M., Brunel, M., Verkampt, F., Désert, M., Colomb, C., & Jund, R. (2014). L’Entretien Cognitif reste-t-il efficace pour aider de très jeunes enfants issus de milieux défavorisés à témoigner d’un événement visuel ? L'Année Psychologique, 114(2), 289–313. https://doi.org/10.3917/anpsy.142.0289

• Type de document : étude empirique

• Accès : ouvert

"""@fr, """ • Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., Firstenberg, I., Hutton, L. A., Sullivan, S. J., Avetissan, I. V., & Prosk, A. L. (1984). Enhancement of eyewitness memory : An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12(1), 74‑80.

• Document type: empirical study

• Access: closed

"""@en, """ • Verkampt, F., & Ginet, M. (2010). Variations of the cognitive interview: Which one is the most effective in enhancing children’s testimonies? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(9), 1279–1296. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1631

• Type de document : étude empirique

• Accès : fermé

"""@fr, """ • Fisher, R. P., & Ashkenazi, T. (2023). The Cognitive Interview in laboratory and field tests of crime and terrorism. In G. E. Oxburgh, T. Myklebust, M. Fallon, & M. Hartwig (Eds.), Interviewing and interrogation: A review of research and practice since World War II (pp. 341–366). Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher.

• Type de document : revue de la littérature

• Accès : ouvert

"""@fr, """ • Ashkenazi, T., & Fisher, R. P. (2022). Field test of the cognitive interview to enhance eyewitness and victim memory, in intelligence investigations of terrorist attacks. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 11(2), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101871

• Type de document : étude empirique

• Accès : fermé

"""@fr, """ • Hurtubise, M.-A., & Viau-Quesnel, C. (2020). Améliorer le rappel des individus âgés de 60 ans et plus à l’aide de l’entretien cognitif: Une revue et méta-analyse. Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, 39(3), 348–364. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980819000424

• Document type: literature review

, meta-analysis

• Access: open

"""@en, """ • Ginet, M., Dodier, O., Bardin, B., Désert, M., Greffeuille, C., & Verkampt, F. (2018). Perspective effects on recall in a testimony paradigm. Journal of General Psychology, 145(4), 313–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2018.1494126

• Type de document : étude empirique

• Accès : fermé

"""@fr, """ • Verkampt, F., Ginet, M., & Colomb, C. (2014). The influence of social instructions on the effectiveness of a cognitive interview used with very young child witnesses. European Review of Applied Psychology, 64(6), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2014.09.003

• Document type: empirical study

• Access: closed

"""@en, """ • Brunel, M., Launay, C., Hermant, M., & Py, J. (2022). Perception of acceptability and usability of a modified cognitive interview in the evaluation of police training in France. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 37(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-020-09416-9

• Type de document : étude empirique

• Accès : fermé

"""@fr, """ • Py, J., & Demarchi, S. (2006). L’entretien cognitif : Son efficacité, son application et ses spécificités. Revue Québecoise de Psychologie, 27(3), 177‑196.

• Type de document : revue de la littérature

• Accès : fermé

"""@fr, """ • Memon, A., Meissner, C. A., & Fraser, J. (2010). The Cognitive Interview : A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(4), 340‑372. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020518

• Document type: meta-analysis

• Access: closed

"""@en, """ • Py, J., Ginet, M., Desperies, C., & Cathey, C. (1997). Cognitive encoding and cognitive interviewing in eyewitness testimony. Swiss Journal of Psychology/Schweizerische Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 56, 33–41.

• Document type: empirical study

• Access: closed

"""@en, """ • Fisher, R. P., & Ashkenazi, T. (2023). The Cognitive Interview in laboratory and field tests of crime and terrorism. In G. E. Oxburgh, T. Myklebust, M. Fallon, & M. Hartwig (Eds.), Interviewing and interrogation: A review of research and practice since World War II (pp. 341–366). Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher.

• Document type: literature review

• Access: open

"""@en, """ • Brunel, M., Launay, C., Hermant, M., & Py, J. (2022). Perception of acceptability and usability of a modified cognitive interview in the evaluation of police training in France. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 37(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-020-09416-9

• Document type: empirical study

• Access: closed

"""@en, """ • Brunel, M., & Py, J. (2013). Questioning the acceptability of the Cognitive Interview to improve its use. L’Année Psychologique, 113(3), 427‑458. https://doi.org/10.4074/S0003503313003059

• Document type: literature review

• Access: open

"""@en, """ • Hurtubise, M.-A., & Viau-Quesnel, C. (2020). Améliorer le rappel des individus âgés de 60 ans et plus à l’aide de l’entretien cognitif: Une revue et méta-analyse. Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, 39(3), 348–364. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980819000424

• Type de document : revue de la littérature

, méta-analyse

• Accès : ouvert

"""@fr, """ • van Can, S., Dodier, O., Otgaar, H., & Verkampt, F. (2016). The benefits of multiple recollection strategies on adolescents’ testimonies: Quality versus within-statement consistency? Journal of Forensic Practice, 18(2), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFP-01-2015-0007

• Document type: empirical study

• Access: closed

"""@en, """ • Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., Firstenberg, I., Hutton, L. A., Sullivan, S. J., Avetissan, I. V., & Prosk, A. L. (1984). Enhancement of eyewitness memory : An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 12(1), 74‑80.

• Type de document : étude empirique

• Accès : fermé

"""@fr, """ • Py, J., Ginet, M., Desperies, C., & Cathey, C. (1997). Cognitive encoding and cognitive interviewing in eyewitness testimony. Swiss Journal of Psychology/Schweizerische Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Revue Suisse de Psychologie, 56, 33–41.

• Type de document : étude empirique

• Accès : fermé

"""@fr, """ • Verkampt, F., & Ginet, M. (2010). Variations of the cognitive interview: Which one is the most effective in enhancing children’s testimonies? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(9), 1279–1296. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1631

• Document type: empirical study

• Access: closed

"""@en, """ • Memon, A., Meissner, C. A., & Fraser, J. (2010). The Cognitive Interview : A meta-analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(4), 340‑372. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020518

• Type de document : méta-analyse

• Accès : fermé

"""@fr, """ • Aschermann, E., Mantwill, M., & Köhnken, G. (1991). An independent replication of the effectiveness of the cognitive interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(6), 489‑495. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050604

• Document type: empirical study

, replication

• Access: closed

"""@en, """ • Aschermann, E., Mantwill, M., & Köhnken, G. (1991). An independent replication of the effectiveness of the cognitive interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(6), 489‑495. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050604

• Type de document : étude empirique

, réplication

• Accès : fermé

"""@fr, """ • Paulo, R. M., Albuquerque, P. B., & Bull, R. (2016). The enhanced cognitive interview: Expressions of uncertainty, motivation and its relation with report accuracy. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(4), 366–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2015.1109089

• Document type: empirical study

• Access: closed

"""@en, """ • Ginet, M. (2003). Les clés de l’entretien avec le témoin ou la victime. La Documentation Française.

• Type de document : revue de la littérature

• Accès : fermé

"""@fr, """ • Ginet, M., Brunel, M., Verkampt, F., Désert, M., Colomb, C., & Jund, R. (2014). L’Entretien Cognitif reste-t-il efficace pour aider de très jeunes enfants issus de milieux défavorisés à témoigner d’un événement visuel ? L'Année Psychologique, 114(2), 289–313. https://doi.org/10.3917/anpsy.142.0289

• Document type: empirical study

• Access: open

"""@en, """ • Ginet, M. (2003). Les clés de l’entretien avec le témoin ou la victime. La Documentation Française.

• Document type: literature review

• Access: closed

"""@en, """ • Ginet, M., Dodier, O., Bardin, B., Désert, M., Greffeuille, C., & Verkampt, F. (2018). Perspective effects on recall in a testimony paradigm. Journal of General Psychology, 145(4), 313–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2018.1494126

• Document type: empirical study

• Access: closed

"""@en ; uneskos:memberOf p66:-Homme, p66:-Psychologie, p66:-MemoryAndLawGroup ; skos:related p66:-J29VW7XV-D, p66:-H0017Q3P-H, p66:-TKZB8HG9-6, p66:-X8JWBGH7-H, p66:-Z3ZVMZ87-7, p66:-Z4TLQPTN-5 ; skos:exactMatch , n9j:-BS5D336K-2, ; dc:created "2017-12-04"^^xsd:date ; skos:altLabel "cognitive interviewing"@en, "Enhanced Cognitive Interview"@en ; a skos:Concept ; skos:prefLabel "entretien cognitif"@fr, "cognitive interview"@en ; skos:broader p66:-GWXM150S-5 ; skos:definition "Entretien d'enquête pour recueillir la parole de témoins oculaires et de victimes coopératifs reposant sur l’utilisation d’aides mnémotechniques et de techniques de communication sociale."@fr, "An investigative interview protocol to collect the testimony of cooperative eyewitnesses and victims based on the use of mnemonic aids and social communication techniques."@en ; dc:modified "2025-06-03"^^xsd:date ; skos:narrower p66:-LGSX4MDR-2, p66:-LPNVDGSN-6, p66:-XVDS7MK9-D ; skos:inScheme p66: . p66:-X8JWBGH7-H skos:prefLabel "episodic specificity induction"@en, "induction de spécificité épisodique"@fr ; a skos:Concept ; skos:related p66:-CMSW56PP-5 . p66:-J29VW7XV-D skos:prefLabel "Geiselman effect"@en, "effet Geiselman"@fr ; a skos:Concept ; skos:related p66:-CMSW56PP-5 . p66:-Z4TLQPTN-5 skos:prefLabel "free recall task"@en, "tâche de rappel libre"@fr ; a skos:Concept ; skos:related p66:-CMSW56PP-5 . p66:-D304PDBZ-3 skos:prefLabel "témoignage oculaire"@fr, "eyewitness testimony"@en ; a skos:Concept ; inist:hasStudyMethod p66:-CMSW56PP-5 .