@prefix p66: <http://data.loterre.fr/ark:/67375/P66> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix isothes: <http://purl.org/iso25964/skos-thes#> .
@prefix dc: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
@prefix uneskos: <http://purl.org/umu/uneskos#> .

p66:-Homme
  skos:prefLabel "Human"@en, "Homme"@fr ;
  a isothes:ConceptGroup ;
  skos:member p66:-BLZGR3RV-1 .

p66:-V3V0Z7B2-R
  skos:prefLabel "concept"@fr, "concept"@en ;
  a skos:Concept ;
  skos:related p66:-BLZGR3RV-1 .

p66:-C7J9JBWW-S
  skos:prefLabel "hub and spoke model"@en, "modèle hub-and-spoke"@fr ;
  a skos:Concept ;
  skos:related p66:-BLZGR3RV-1 .

p66:-BLZGR3RV-1
  dc:creator "Frank Arnould" ;
  skos:hiddenLabel "symboles modaux"@fr, "modal symbols"@en, "représentations modales"@fr, "modal representations"@en, "modality-specific representations"@en ;
  skos:related p66:-TMHZZ0G7-F, p66:-V3V0Z7B2-R, p66:-TJCGVV56-5, p66:-C7J9JBWW-S ;
  a skos:Concept ;
  dc:bibliographicCitation """<span class ="replaced2">	•	 Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577‑660.  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149</a></span> <span class="reified-property-value xl-pref-label tooltip-html"><p><img src="resource/pics/infoBlue.png"/>	</p><div class="reified-tooltip tooltip-html-content"><p><span class="tooltip-prop">• Type de document</span> : <span class="versal">revue de la littérature</span></p> <p><span class="tooltip-prop">• Accès</span> : <span class="versal">fermé</span></p>"""@fr, """<span class ="replaced2">	•	 Michel, C. (2021). Overcoming the modal/amodal dichotomy of concepts. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 20(4), 655‑677.  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09678-y">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09678-y</a></span> <span class="reified-property-value xl-pref-label tooltip-html"><p><img src="resource/pics/infoBlue.png"/>	</p><div class="reified-tooltip tooltip-html-content"><p><span class="tooltip-prop">• Type de document</span> : <span class="versal">revue de la littérature</span></p> <p><span class="tooltip-prop">• Accès</span> : <span class="versal">ouvert</span></p>"""@fr, """<span class ="replaced2">	•	 Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577‑660.  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149</a></span> <span class="reified-property-value xl-pref-label tooltip-html"><p><img src="resource/pics/infoBlue.png"/>	</p><div class="reified-tooltip tooltip-html-content"><p><span class="tooltip-prop">• Document type</span>: <span class="versal">literature review</span></p> <p><span class="tooltip-prop">• Access</span>: <span class="versal">closed</span></p>"""@en, """<span class ="replaced2">	•	 Michel, C. (2021). Overcoming the modal/amodal dichotomy of concepts. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 20(4), 655‑677.  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09678-y">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09678-y</a></span> <span class="reified-property-value xl-pref-label tooltip-html"><p><img src="resource/pics/infoBlue.png"/>	</p><div class="reified-tooltip tooltip-html-content"><p><span class="tooltip-prop">• Document type</span>: <span class="versal">literature review</span></p> <p><span class="tooltip-prop">• Access</span>: <span class="versal">open</span></p>"""@en, """<span class ="replaced2">	•	 Haimovici, S. (2018). The modal—amodal distinction in the debate on conceptual format. Philosophies, 3(2), 7.  <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies3020007">https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies3020007</a></span> <span class="reified-property-value xl-pref-label tooltip-html"><p><img src="resource/pics/infoBlue.png"/>	</p><div class="reified-tooltip tooltip-html-content"><p><span class="tooltip-prop">• Document type</span>: <span class="versal">literature review</span></p> <p><span class="tooltip-prop">• Access</span>: <span class="versal">open</span></p>"""@en, """<span class ="replaced2">	•	 Haimovici, S. (2018). The modal—amodal distinction in the debate on conceptual format. Philosophies, 3(2), 7.  <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies3020007">https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies3020007</a></span> <span class="reified-property-value xl-pref-label tooltip-html"><p><img src="resource/pics/infoBlue.png"/>	</p><div class="reified-tooltip tooltip-html-content"><p><span class="tooltip-prop">• Type de document</span> : <span class="versal">revue de la littérature</span></p> <p><span class="tooltip-prop">• Accès</span> : <span class="versal">ouvert</span></p>"""@fr ;
  dc:modified "2023-04-04"^^xsd:date ;
  skos:definition "Idée selon laquelle le format des représentations conceptuelles repose sur des propriétés perceptives et motrices."@fr, "The idea that the format of conceptual representations is based on perceptual and motor properties."@en ;
  skos:altLabel "modality-specific representation"@en, "modal symbol"@en, "symbole modal"@fr ;
  skos:inScheme p66: ;
  skos:broader p66:-XV9RQQS0-9 ;
  uneskos:memberOf p66:-Psychologie, p66:-Homme ;
  skos:prefLabel "représentation modale"@fr, "modal representation"@en ;
  dc:created "2017-12-04"^^xsd:date .

p66:-Psychologie
  skos:prefLabel "Psychologie"@fr, "Psychology"@en ;
  a isothes:ConceptGroup ;
  skos:member p66:-BLZGR3RV-1 .

p66:-TJCGVV56-5
  skos:prefLabel "simulation mentale"@fr, "mental simulation"@en ;
  a skos:Concept ;
  skos:related p66:-BLZGR3RV-1 .

p66:-TMHZZ0G7-F
  skos:prefLabel "embodied cognition"@en, "cognition incarnée"@fr ;
  a skos:Concept ;
  skos:related p66:-BLZGR3RV-1 .

p66: a skos:ConceptScheme .
p66:-XV9RQQS0-9
  skos:prefLabel "mental representation"@en, "représentation mentale"@fr ;
  a skos:Concept ;
  skos:narrower p66:-BLZGR3RV-1 .