@prefix n9j: <http://data.loterre.fr/ark:/67375/N9J> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix isothes: <http://purl.org/iso25964/skos-thes#> .

n9j:-DGD0K0ZC-2
  skos:prefLabel "cases in higher education law: faculty issues"@en ;
  a skos:Concept ;
  skos:narrower n9j:-WP1FZ6J2-F .

n9j:-WP1FZ6J2-F
  owl:sameAs <https://concepts.sagepub.com/social-science/concept/Regents_of_the_University_of_Michigan_v._Ewing> ;
  skos:definition "In Regents of the University of Michigan v. Ewing (1985), the U.S. Supreme Court faced the issue of whether university officials acted arbitrarily in violation of a student's substantive due process rights when a faculty board dismissed him from a program without granting him an opportunity to retake a medical board examination that he failed. The Court noted the judicial deference to academic professionals on matters of substantive due process that it had granted seven years earlier in Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. Horowitz (1978), another case involving the academic dismissal of a student in a medical school. [Source: Encyclopedia of Law and Higher Education; Regents of the University of Michigan v. Ewing]"@en ;
  a skos:Concept ;
  skos:inScheme n9j: ;
  skos:broader n9j:-DGD0K0ZC-2 ;
  skos:prefLabel "Regents of the University of Michigan v. Ewing"@en .

n9j: a skos:ConceptScheme .
n9j:-cases
  a isothes:ConceptGroup ;
  skos:prefLabel "cases"@en ;
  skos:member n9j:-WP1FZ6J2-F .

