@prefix n9j: <http://data.loterre.fr/ark:/67375/N9J> .
@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix isothes: <http://purl.org/iso25964/skos-thes#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .

n9j: a skos:ConceptScheme .
n9j:-G4782VQ5-H
  skos:prefLabel "litigation: desegregation and affirmative action"@en ;
  a skos:Concept ;
  skos:narrower n9j:-B1FK4N2V-1 .

n9j:-ZR526KQQ-N
  skos:prefLabel "Supreme Court cases"@en ;
  a skos:Concept ;
  skos:narrower n9j:-B1FK4N2V-1 .

n9j:-JZ6JP997-G
  skos:prefLabel "legal cases"@en ;
  a skos:Concept ;
  skos:narrower n9j:-B1FK4N2V-1 .

n9j:-cases
  a isothes:ConceptGroup ;
  skos:prefLabel "cases"@en ;
  skos:member n9j:-B1FK4N2V-1 .

n9j:-B1FK4N2V-1
  owl:sameAs <https://concepts.sagepub.com/social-science/concept/Gong_Lum_v._Rice> ;
  skos:notation "Date: 1927"@en ;
  skos:definition "Gong Lum v. Rice (1927) stands out as the case within which the U.S. Supreme Court explicitly extended the pernicious doctrine of “separate but equal” that it introduced at the national level to public education in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896). At issue in Gong Lum, which was decided 27 years prior to Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954), were two related issues. [Source: Encyclopedia of Education Law; Gong Lum v. Rice]"@en ;
  a skos:Concept ;
  skos:inScheme n9j: ;
  skos:broader n9j:-JZ6JP997-G, n9j:-G4782VQ5-H, n9j:-ZR526KQQ-N ;
  skos:prefLabel "Gong Lum v. Rice"@en .