Skip to main content

Cognitive psychology of human memory (CogMemo thesaurus)

Search from vocabulary

  • Help
align
annotate
download

Concept information

process > cognitive process > metamemory process > memory-editing process > recall-to-reject process

Preferred term

recall-to-reject process  

Definition

  • Memory monitoring process to avoid false memories in recognition tasks and "based on the recall of logically inconsistent information (which disqualifies the false event from having occurred)" (Gallo et al., 2006, p. 730).

Broader concept

Related concepts

Synonym(s)

  • disqualifying recall-to-reject
  • recollection rejection

Belongs to group

Bibliographic citation(s)

  • • Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., Wright, R., & Mojardin, A. H. (2003). Recollection rejection: False-memory editing in children and adults. Psychological Review, 110(4), 762–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.4.762

    • Document type: empirical study

    • Access: closed

  • • Cadavid, S., Beato, M. S., Suarez, M., & Albuquerque, P. B. (2021). Feelings of contrast at test reduce false memory in the deese/roediger-mcdermott paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 3937. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686390

    • Document type: empirical study

    • Access: open

  • • Clark, S. E. (1992). Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition. Memory & Cognition, 20(3), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199660

    • Document type: empirical study

    • Access: open

  • • Gallo, D. A. (2004). Using recall to reduce false recognition: Diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(1), 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.120

    • Document type: empirical study

    • Access: closed

  • • Gallo, D. A., Bell, D. M., Beier, J. S., & Schacter, D. L. (2006). Two types of recollection-based monitoring in younger and older adults: Recall-to-reject and the distinctiveness heuristic. Memory, 14(6), 730–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210600648506

    • Document type: empirical study

    • Access: closed

  • • Moore, K. N., Lampinen, J. M., Bridges, A. J., & Gallo, D. A. (2020). Developmental trends in children’s use of different monitoring processes to avoid false memories. Cognitive Development, 55, 100911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100911

    • Document type: empirical study

    • Access: closed

  • • Pierce, B. H., Waring, J. D., Schacter, D. L., & Budson, A. E. (2008). Effects of distinctive encoding on source-based false recognition: Further examination of recall-to-reject processes in aging and alzheimer disease. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 21(3), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNN.0b013e31817d74e7

    • Document type: empirical study

    • Access: closed

  • • Rotello, C. M., & Heit, E. (1999). Two-process models of recognition memory: Evidence for recall-to-reject? Journal of Memory and Language, 40(3), 432–453. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2623

    • Document type: empirical study

    • Access: closed

  • • Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., & Van Tassel, G. (2000). Recall-to-reject in recognition: Evidence from ROC curves. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2701

    • Document type: empirical study

    • Access: closed

Creator

  • Frank Arnould

In other languages

URI

http://data.loterre.fr/ark:/67375/P66-T8C6ZFJT-3

Download this concept:

RDF/XML TURTLE JSON-LD Created 3/15/22, last modified 9/4/23